Blog Post
News
Crime
[02/03] Past claims raise further questions about teacher
[02/03] Woman charged in beheading plot to appear in court
[02/03] Man accused of killing girl to appear in court
Read More
White Collar Crime
[12/16]
[11/21]
[11/21]
Read More
Recent Updates
March 20, 2011
Proposed Virginia Law Would Give Sex Crime Victims More Time to Sue
October 21, 2010
What is a Reckless Driving Summons?
October 21, 2010
What is the legal standard for a DWI or DUI stop and arrest in Fairfax County Virginia?
October 16, 2010
Victims of Crimes in Virginia Can Sue for Compensation
October 15, 2010
Distracted Driving Continues, Fairfax Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer and Car Accident Attorney Notes Cell Phone Laws Are Not Working
October 15, 2010
Critical Mistakes to Avoid After Being Charged with DWI/DUI in Virginia - Calling the Police Officer to Discuss Your Case
October 14, 2010
Drunk Driver Involved in Accident that Kills Passenger
October 14, 2010
Reckless Driving Charge Against Redskins' Williams Dismissed
July 02, 2010
Surviving a Virginia DWI/DUI or Reckless Driving Charge
November 29, 2009
Virginia Court Rules Additional Proof Needed in Prosecution for Trespassing
Archives
Virginia Court Rules Positive Alert by Narcotics Dog Was Not Sufficient Probable Cause to Search Passenger
October 04, 2009
Topic: Police Procedure, Stops & Searches
In Whitehead v. Commonwealth, the Virginia Supreme Court has held that a positive alert on a vehicle, detained after as traffic stop, by a trained narcotics detection dog, certified to detect the odors of marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamine, combined with the subsequent fruitless searches of the vehicle, the driver, and two passengers, did not provide sufficient particularized probable cause to allow a search of the only remaining passenger in the vehicle. Accordingly, the court held that the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the search at issue did not violate the Fourth Amendment was in error and therefore was reversed. In addition, because the evidence seized as a result of the search should have been suppressed, there would be insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for possession of a scheduled I or II controlled drug on retrial. The court therefore vacated the Defendant's conviction and dismissed the indictment.
Manikas Law LLC | Visit our main website or call us at 703-873-7473 or 888-503-8075 | We offer a free, no obligation consultation by former prosecutor Kyle G. Manikas | Fairfax Virginia felony, misdemeanor, & traffic/motor vehicle defense lawyers. Serving Fairfax County, Prince William County (including all Manassas courts), Loudoun County (including Leesburg), and other parts of Northern Virginia.
Attachments:
VaSupCt-Whitehead2.pdf

